AMERICAS FUTURE IS GREEN (IN A SMALLER PACKAGE)

AMERICAS FUTURE IS GREEN (IN A SMALLER PACKAGE)

Essay by Sam Smith, editor of the Progressive Review, activist, social critic and author of four books. Smith has covered Washington under nine presidents, began one of the first alternative publications of the 1960s, and helped to start the national Green Party.

By Sam Smith

IF nothing happens to change things, it looks as if Hillary Clinton will be running against Rudy Giuliani in 2008. Let's hope something happens to change things because it is hard to imagine a more depressing choice, the final triumph of money and media over democracy and sanity.

Yet, even on the left, one doesn't get much sense that we seem to be moving from frying pan to fire. Six years bitter experience has left many liberals and progressives convinced that exorcising the demon in the White House and finding a Democratic replacement is all we need for happiness.

It doesn't work like that. It is a reasonable bet that after eight years of the next administration - of whatever party - the overwhelming majority of the sins of the Bush years will remain, quietly institutionalized either because of lack of will, lack of votes or an excess of inertia.

The primary reason for this is that in politics we get the presidents we deserve and a Clinton-Giuliani race would reflect the fact that in neither party is there sufficient will to do things differently - to rebel against the corrupt, cynical anti-democratic spirit that these two power-obsessed leaders represent.

As the right has demonstrated over the past quarter century, the creation of a new popular paradigm is a complex, expensive and lengthy business. One can argue that the right had a grossly unfair advantage by controlling the hearts of corporations, mass media and evangelicals who happily and mindlessly spread its message to an unwitting electorate.

This is true, but there is another factor that hardly ever gets discussed. The left has blown it.

In fact, since the beginning of the Reagan administration there has not been a single mass movement on the part of the left that has made any significant impact on the country.

Part of this has been a matter of priorities. Under Reagan and the Bushes, the left was happy to do what it seems to like best: protest. Under Clinton it switched gears and quietly and obediently complied. In either case - dissenter or drone - the left did little to offer Americans an alternative vision, platform or movement.

Twenty years ago, as a member of the board of a national liberal organization, I found words for my concern as we discussed the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork. Defeating Bork, I noted, was a necessity but it was not a policy. And we needed more policies.

I could tell from the room that I had said something alien. Who are we, I sensed around me, if we are not in opposition?

As recently as the last presidential campaign, I suggested a national progressive confab at which a list of major priorities would be compiled so everyone would know what we wanted, instead of leaving it to Fox News and David Broder to define for us. Again, it fell flat.

I suspect a part of the problem is that liberals behave much like many abused children; they view themselves more as victims than as survivors. This is not surprising given that two of their major constituencies - blacks and Jews - place particular emphasis on victimhood in their political rhetoric. But in the end, it is a choice that even the worst treated make in different ways, which is why some of the most impressive survivors are found in some of America's worst neighborhoods.

Rather than exhibiting the will to rewrite the story of themselves and America, too often liberals wallow in the mud pits into which their opponents have driven them and, when they can't take any more, willingly grab the hand of whatever hustler comes their way.

In this way, 2008 already reminds one of 1992 when liberals lined up for Clinton because he looked like he would win and might throw them a few bones along the way. In fact, in different ways, both Hillary Clinton and Brack Obama are modeling their efforts on Bill Clinton.

With HRC it's a quality that the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette found in her husband: "It is not the compromises [Clinton] has made that trouble so much as the unavoidable suspicion that he has no great principles to compromise." With Obama it's the cynical use of hope - or, as Clinton put it, Hope - treated as though it was the candidate's personal gift to provide. In fact, in the last days of his campaign, Clinton ran a television commercial filmed from the window of a moving bus. The voice-over said: "Something's happening out there. A feeling. Call it hope. That a country can move in a new direction. That the future is something to look forward to. Not fear. If that's what you're feeling, you may have noticed something else. You are not alone." Obama before his time.

In either case there is a quality that Christopher Hitchens found in early Clinton Washington as being like that in Peter Pan, in which the children are told that if they stop clapping, Tinker Belle will die.

That pretty well sums up today's liberalism: you either oppose or you clap.

There are at least three other reasons beyond the psychological why this is so.

First: Major liberal organizations function much like all lobbying groups. Not only are they too far removed from the grassroots and too close to power, they are extremely protective of their own position in among the elite. Thus the mere notion of an effective coalition is troubling.

Second: Since they don't have as much money as the right, it would seem logical that liberal groups became expert as grass root organizing. They're not. One explanation for this is that since the advent of television, everyone has played by the rules of virtual communication and part of this reduces the voter to a viewer, petition signer, or contributor. One rarely finds anymore the sort of organizing spirit of, say, Saul Alinsky or the anti-poverty era and - on the left - scarcely ever does one see the multi-faceted organizing of the Christian right. If the left only uses the tools of mass media, they will have their Move Ons to be sure, but the right will just keep moving on.

Third: Much of the power and the money in liberal organizations comes from a new liberal elite - including large numbers of successful urbanites, women, gays, blacks etc. This elite has its own agenda which - regardless of its virtues - tends to ignore or deemphasize agendas of the less powerful and less well off who, incidentally, vote in much larger numbers. This is not an incurable problem but it at least has to be faced.

One big exception to all this is the Democratic populist wing, an ill-formed amalgam that believes Democrats are here to do the most good for the most people. But it, too, has yet to find good footings for a new movement. Even the efforts of John Edwards in this regard will ultimately fail unless people rally to his cause and not just to his candidacy.

Another major exception is the Green Party which, good as its heart is, has yet to tie its platform into a small and neat enough package that the media, let alone America, can grasp.

In short, the American left has a choice. Either it remains the victim of alternative predators - the right on one hand, the Clintons and Obamas on the other. Or it takes charge of its own future and that of the country by agreeing within itself on a clear program and then - in the manner of the abolitionists, populists, socialists, suffragettes and civil rights activists - takes this message to every little corner of the land it is trying to change for the better.

Check out his website, Progressive Review -
http://prorev.com/


2010 - Election Results

Montana Green Party candidate for House District 11, Cheryl Wolfe, received nearly 25% of the vote in the conservative-leaning district which includes precincts in Lake and Flathead Counties.

2010 Montana HD11 Election Results

******************************************

Green Party results on Election Day: ballot status in Massachusetts, New York, and Texas

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Immediate Release:
Monday, November 8, 2010

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, cell 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Green Party's Election Recap and Results:

Green Party ballot status page:

WASHINGTON, DC -- The Green Party regained ballot status in three states on Election Day 2010 and Green Mayor Gayle McLaughlin was reelected in Richmond, California, among several other victories in that state.

Green election results in Massachusetts, New York, and Texas won ballot access for these states, thanks to the campaigns of Nat Fortune for State Auditor in Massachusetts, Howie Hawkins and Gloria Mattera for governor and lieutenant governor in New York, and Ed Lindsay for Comptroller in Texas. Green Parties in California, the District of Columbia, and Michigan maintained their ballot status.

Having ballot status in three of the most populous states will make a Green presidential campaign much easier in 2012.

A list of victories, including ballot status wins, follows below. News from other races: Jesse Johnson was endorsed by leading Democrats Mike Gravel and Ken Hechler in his West Virginia race for the US Senate. LeAlan Jones (Illinois) and John Gray (Arkansas) were declared winners by reporters in their state's debates, with Mr. Jones declared the winner of a debate he was barred from attending. In a historic first, Arizona Green candidate Jerry Joslyn confronted John McCain on his war spending in a US Senate debate.

GREEN VICTORIES, including ballot access, on November 2, 2010
(unofficial Results):

ARKANSAS

Joy Ballard won her race for Saline County Collector, finishing first of seven candidates for one seat with 19,131 votes, 69.28%.

CALIFORNIA

Gayle McLaughlin won her reelection to Mayor of Richmond, Contra Costa County, finishing first of three candidates with 6,282 votes or 40.43%.
http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CA/Contra_Costa/21781/39347/en/summary.html

Bruce Delgado won his reelection to Mayor of Marina City, Monterey County, finishing first of two candidates with 1,734 votes or 56.78%.
http://www.montereycountyelections.us/Election%20Result_dtl.htm#cont17

Dan Hamburg won his race for Mendocino County Board of Supervisors, District 5, finishing first of two candidates with 2,474 votes or 55.28%.
http://www.co.mendocino.ca.us/acr/cgi-bin/current.pl

Lisa Stephens, Jesse Townley, and Pam Webster won their reelection to the Rent Stabilization Board of Berkeley, Alameda County. There will have been at least three Greens on the nine-member board from 2002 through 2014.
http://www.co.alameda.ca.us/rov/current_election/4354.htm

Robert Deutsch won his reelection to Board of Directors, Alameda Healthcare District, Alameda County, finishing first of four candidates for two seats with 8,048 votes or 30.65%.
http://www.co.alameda.ca.us/rov/current_election/1269.htm

Joe Navarro won his race for Hollister School Board, San Benito County, finishing second of eight candidates for three seats with 2,424 votes or 15.56%.
http://results.sbcvote.us/#cont97

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Ann Wilcox's 12,055 votes (10.20%) for DC Council Chair and David Schwartzman's 11,799 votes (6.78%) for DC Council At-Large maintained the DC Statehood Green Party's ballot line.
http://www.gp.org/ballotstatus/dc/

JB Shoats ran unopposed for Advisory Neighborhood Commission SMD 8B04.
http://www.dcboee.org/election_info/election_results/general_election_results/2010

FLORIDA

Anita Stewart won her race for Hillsborough County Soil and Water Conservation District 5, finishing first of five candidates for one seat with 82,289 votes or 37.75%.
http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/FL/Hillsborough/22912/39204/en/summary.html#

IOWA

Raymond Meyer was re-elected to Lucas County Health Center Board of Trustees, finishing second for two seats with 2,202 votes out of 3,617 possible. By the end of his next term, Raymond Meyer will have served for 16 consecutive years in office, and is tied for third among all US Greens for the longest in any elected office (http://www.gp.org/elections/officeholders/most-total-yrs.shtml). Meyer is also a member of the City Council of Chariton, Iowa, to which he was elected in 2009.

MAINE

John Anton won his reelection to Portland City Council, At-large, Cumberland County, finishing second of four candidates for two seats with 12,114 votes.

MASSACHUSETTS

Nat Fortune received 105,812 votes or 5% in his run for State Auditor, which surpassed the 3% of the vote in a statewide election necessary for the Green Rainbow Party of Massachusetts (GRP) to regain ballot status.

MICHIGAN

Preliminary returns suggest that every one of the Green Party statewide candidates earned votes in excess of the ballot-access retention threshold, any one of whom would secure the ballot-line for the next election.

NEW YORK

Howie Hawkins for Governor, Gloria Mattera for Lt. Governor, received 58,123 votes (at last count), more than the 50,000 votes needed to maintain the Green Party ballot line into the next election cycle.
http://www.gp.org/ballotstatus/ny

OREGON

Michael Beilstein won his reelection to Corvallis City Council Ward 5, Benton County, finishing first of two candidates for one seat with 838 votes or 64.81%.
http://www.co.benton.or.us/admin/elections/results.php

Richard Hervey won his reelection to Corvallis City Council Ward 3, Benton County, finishing first of two candidates for one seat with 791 votes or 63.08%.
http://www.co.benton.or.us/admin/elections/results.php

TEXAS

Ed Lindsay's 251,842 votes or 6% for Comptroller guarantees that the Green Party of Texas will be on the ballot in 2012.
http://www.gp.org/ballotstatus/tx

Election totals were collected by Brent McMillan, Executive Director of the Green Party of the United States.

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN

Green candidate database and campaign information:
http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml

Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml
Green Party Speakers Bureau http://www.gp.org/speakers
Green Party ballot access page http://www.gp.org/ballotstatus
Green Party Livestream Channel http://www.livestream.com/greenpartyus

Green Pages: The official publication of record of the Green Party of the United States (Fall 2010 issue now online)
http://gp.org/greenpages-blog

___

Disclaimer: State, local, and candidate press releases made available here represent the opinions of the original source only. Opinions expressed by a state party or candidate do not necessarily represent the views of the Green Party of the United States. State party contact information, when provided with candidate releases, does not imply state party endorsement of the opinions expressed nor of the candidate (prior to gaining formal nomination by the party).
___

Office: PO Box 57065 Washington, D.C. 20037
Email: GPHQ--at--gp.org 202-319-7191 or toll-free (US): 866-41GREEN


2010 - Global Greens Statement for COP16 in Cancun, December 2010

Climate change – time for transformation

Global Greens Statement for COP16 in Cancun, December 2010

1 December 2010

The Global Greens call on the leaders of the world’s industrialised countries at Cancun to reverse the failure of Copenhagen and create the conditions for a strong legally binding global climate agreement to avoid dangerous climate change and facilitate adaptation.

COP 16 at Cancun Mexico, from 29 November to 10 December, is the sixteenth meeting of parties to the UN Framework on Climate Convention since it was negotiated at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. Green parties from around a dozen countries will be represented.

The Global Greens, representing many millions of the Earth’s citizens, recognise that humanity cannot continue to live beyond the Earth’s ecological limits. Cancun is an opportunity to begin the transformation to sustainability, including through --

1. Political will and practical mechanisms to constrain global warming to no more than +2°C above pre-industrial levels, especially by moving rapidly beyond coal and other fossil fuels through investment in energy-saving, resource-efficiency, and renewable energy.

2. Rules for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation including safeguards that ensure claimed emission reductions represent genuine abatement, that benefit and protect Indigenous peoples’ rights, and that protect and restore biodiversity, water and nature.

3. Commitment of substantial new funding by developed countries for emissions mitigation and climate change adaptation by developing countries.

4. Greenhouse gas accounting rules that prevent perverse outcomes, such as promoting biofuel plantations at the expense of biodiversity and critical food production in developing countries and giving loopholes to developed countries in the land use, land-use change and forestry sector.

5. Exclusion of carbon capture and storage from the Clean Development Mechanism, and rejection of nuclear power altogether.

The COP16 should commit to finalizing a legally binding agreement no later than 2011 covering these and other issues, building on the Kyoto Protocol.

Climate change – time for transformation | Global Greens


2010 - Green Party member and musical icon David Rovics to appear in Polson, Montana, September 12, 2010

details at: http://www.votecherylwolfe.org/


2010 - Montana Green Party Annual Meeting

Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010 Time: MGP Business Meeting 9am - 12pm Pot Luck Barbecue and Party 12pm - 8pm Location: Boettcher Park, Polson, MT Here's the map: http://is.gd/bF9rg Please join us for a gathering of good people working towards a Green future. Share information, picnic, play and relax on the shore of spectacular Flathead Lake. Network and join forces with other Greens, friends, and families. Boettcher Park is ideal for the whole crew. We have reserved a covered area, and there is a playground, swimming area, restrooms, parking. Special BBQ potluck, music, and friends. Bring your old friends and meet some new ones. We're all in this together! Polson is close to one-of-a-kind, precious national treasure that is Glacier National Park, as well as the National Bison Range, which has its own secret sweet spots. Enjoy Ninepipes, Wild Horse Island, fishing, boating or hiking. Make it a weekend!

2010 - Montana Green Party candidate Cheryl Wolfe of Polson announces her campaign for House District No. 11 Representative

Montana Green Party candidate Cheryl Wolfe of Polson announces her campaign for House District No. 11 Representative

With the help of local volunteers, Cheryl Wolfe gained enough signatures to get on the ballot as a minor party candidate. “Lots of people don’t know about the Green Party but most of the people I spoke with felt that increased public participation is a good thing. Many people who signed are not Green Party members but felt as I do, that too many of our elected representatives are working for party politics, special interests and the money and power that paid to put them there. As an ordinary person I don’t feel represented and wanted a better choice. That’s why I’m running,” said Ms. Wolfe.

Before moving to Montana in 1995 to be close to family, Ms. Wolfe worked various jobs including some involving mud, blood, and beer. From picking strawberries in Oregon and selling her own bedding plants from a greenhouse, spending three years as a veterinary assistant in New Mexico, volunteer work as an EMT in Colorado, and managing ski resort beverage department services and catering at a ski resort for several years, “long hours and hard work weren’t enough to support my family.” She worked her way through college as a single mother to graduate with honors, continued her studies to pass the CPA exam, and completed the experience requirements to qualify for her license in 1998. “Most of my work since then has been in private industry with many different types of businesses and individuals and I’ve had the opportunity to see a lot of pain and a lot of waste. Between the economic situation, ineffective regulation, and politicians who use fear and misinformation to divide people, we are being squeezed from all directions. I’m not willing to give in to cynicism, though; I truly believe we can improve our situation by working together and persisting in spite of the serious challenges we face.”

Cheryl Wolfe can be contacted at 406-270-7554
or visit her pages at
http://www.votecherylwolfe.org/


2010 - The Green Party will have a table at the "Love Your Mother Earth Festival"

The Green Party will have an information table at the "Love Your Mother
Festival" June 11-13 at Rock Creek Lodge. If you want to find out more
about the Green Party, be sure to stop by the table. Cheryl Wolfe, candidate
for HD11, will be there part of the time.

The Love Your Mother Earth Festival, the fourth annual sustainable music
gathering, will be held June 11-13 at Rock Creek Lodge, located just off
I-90 at Exit 126 in Clinton.

The venue offers easy accessibility, plenty of space and on site camping,
with fishing and hiking areas nearby.

This year's festival hosts more than 50 acts on four stages, with genres
including rock, bluegrass, ska, reggae, jam bands, soul, funk and
electronica. Performers include Elephant Revival, U.V. Hippo, The Giving
Tree Band, Cash for Junkers, Broken Valley Roadshow, YAMN!, Klickitat,
HumanLab, SisterMonk, Whitewater Ramble, Trevor Green, Miller Creek, Warsaw
Poland Brothers, Nadis Warriors, Equaleyes, Secret Powers, In Walks Bud, and
many more.

The festival also features a variety of workshops and information booths
focusing on sustainable practices such as composting, recycling, organic
farming, alternative energy sources and the use of non-toxic products in
daily life. Drum and dance workshops, nature walks, educational speakers,
children's activities, and sustainable craft and food vendors are also part
of festivities.

Every year, the event's sponsors, Earthbound Productions, strive to lessen
the carbon footprint of the Love Your Mother Earth Festival. The Green Team
sorts and recycles all festival trash; and the energy used for the festival
is either bio-diesel or is replaced on the power grid by alternative energy
sources, or "green tagged."

The shuttle bus from Capt'n Trips runs on locally made bio-diesel and
vendors use biodegradable wares and sell sustainable products.
Promotional materials for the festival are also printed on recycled paper.
"We not only aim to educate our community, but to practice sustainability
from within," say sponsors.

Tickets are $40 until June 10 and $50 at the gate, and available at Rockin'
Rudy's, Wordens and the UM Box Office in Missoula, or online at
http://www.griztix.com.

Camping fee is $10 per car, and no glass, dogs, weapons or fireworks will be
allowed.


2011 Challenge to Congress to Restore the Rule of Law

Green Party leaders challenge the new Congress to restore the rule of law after a decade of constitutional violations and abuses of power by Presidents and other officials

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release:
Monday, January 17, 2011

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, cell 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Greens cite election theft, vote theft, torture, warrantless surveillance of US citizens, official lies and impunity, 'preemptive' military attacks, denied rights in DC and Puerto Rico

WASHINGTON, DC -- Green Party leaders challenged Democrats and Republicans in the 112th Congress, as well as President Obama, to end a decade of reckless violations of the US Constitution, international agreements, and other laws by the US government and begin a new era of respect for the rule of law.

"The new Congress began with a reading of the Constitution in the US House, but the document seems to be incomprehensible for many Representatives," said Muhammed Malik, co-chair of the Miami-Dade Green Party in Florida (http://www.miamidadegreenparty.org). "The protections enshrined in the constitutional amendments and Article Six's requirement that the US honor treaties are not subject to the whims of Presidents, State Departments, the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, the Transportation Security Administration, or any other government body. If we don't restore the rule of law now, we're in danger of seeing the end of the US as a republic and a free country."

Greens listed examples of official lawlessness and disregard for rights since 2000:

The Obama Administration has maintained many of the Bush-Cheney abuses of the Constitution: denial of habeas corpus, detention of suspects for long periods without charges, persecution of whistleblowers, targeting of innocent Muslim and Arab individuals and organizations, and surveillance without warrant of US citizens. The Obama Justice Department has refused to investigate and prosecute Bush-Cheney officials for torture and other crimes -- including President Bush himself, who has boasted publicly of his approval for waterboarding.

Guantanamo and several 'black sites' remain open. The treatment of Khalid El-Masri (tortured under the US's extraordinary rendition program, later found to be innocent), PFC Bradley Manning (detained in solitary confinement but unconvicted for leaking classified material to Wikileaks: see http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/12/14/manning and http://www.psysr.org/about/programs/humanrights/gates-manning-letter.php), and other prisoners reveals increasing disregard for laws against torture in the US Constitution and Geneva Conventions.

The Green Party of the United States endorsed impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) introduced articles of impeachment in December 2006, before joining the Green Party and becoming the 2008 Green presidential nominee.

Military action outside of immediate self-defense is prohibited under international law, but the Bush Administration launched the invasion of Iraq based on the neocon doctrine of 'preemption,' which is now embraced by both Democrats and Republicans. Some members of Congress have urged a military assault on Iran based on the same doctrine.

The US, under both Bush and Obama presidencies, has continued to politically support and fund Israel's brutal treatment of Palestinians, which violates scores of UN Security Council resolutions and amounts to war crimes under international law.

The Wikileaks cables have exposed extralegal actions and official lies, including US airstrikes in Yemen (denied by President Obama), secret military operations in Pakistan, a secret agreement with Britain to allow US bases in the UK to stockpile cluster bombs, and bribery and illegal surveillance to undermine opposition to US climate change policies (http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4215).

"Exposure of wrong-doing by government officials, which often requires publication of secret documents, is the responsibility of the press in a free society. The claim that Julian Assange doesn't deserve First Amendment protections because he isn't a credentialed reporter is unfounded, since the First Amendment covers everyone, not just professional journalists," said Pat LaMarche, weekly columnist for Maine's largest daily newspaper, The Bangor Daily News and 2004 Green nominee for Vice President. (See http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=372)

Irregularities in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections disenfranchised thousands of US citizens, especially black, young, and low-income voters. The Supreme Court's patently biased Bush v. Gore decision (2000), which handed the presidency to George W. Bush, held that no national right to vote exists.

Greens led the effort in 2004 to expose and challenge election irregularities in Ohio and New Mexico (http://www.iwantmyvote.com). Although two Republican operatives were convicted in January 2007 of election tampering in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Congress has taken no action to protect voters' rights.

Greens have argued that Section 2 of the 14th Amendment requires punishment for states that "abridge" voting rights. In the wake of the 2004 election, Asa Gordon, chair of the DC Statehood Green Party's Electoral College Task Force, filed suit against the malapportionment of Electoral College votes under the US's winner-take-all election system, citing Section 2's penalty clause and the legacy of racial disenfranchisement in southern states.

On Jan. 4, the day before the first session of the 112th Congress, Mr. Gordon was granted an emergency presentation of arguments before US District Court Judge Henry H. Kennedy challenging the seating of Representatives from southern states. Mr. Gordon's motion is currently pending. (More information and documents: http://www.electors.us or contact Asa Gordon at 202-635-7926)

Whole populations of the US remain outside the US Constitution's coverage. The local laws of the District of Columbia are subject to Congress's control and veto power, regardless of the will of DC residents. Whether Democrats or Republicans have been in control, the White House and Congress have ignored the repeated requests by the citizens of the nation's capital, with its black majority, for full representation in Congress and statehood.

The US has also ignored demands by the people of Puerto Rico for self-determination and independence, ignoring protests against US Navy bomb detonations in Vieques, which have spread depleted uranium contamination, and unwanted laws and policies imposed on the island by the US government.

"The Green Party calls for the end of the colonial treatment of people living in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and others who've been denied self-determination and self-government," said Darryl! L.C. Moch, who serves on the steering committee of the DC Statehood Green Party (http://www.dcstatehoodgreen.org). "We support statehood for DC (http://www.gp.org/press/pr-state.php?ID=172). We support the 2005 draft resolution by the UN's Special Committee on Decolonization calling on the US to allow the Puerto Rican people to exercise fully their right to self-determination and independence (http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/gacol3121.doc.htm). Bipartisan inaction on DC and Puerto RIco are an affront to the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the US's own equal protection laws. It's time to complete the unfinished business of the Civil Rights Movement and the national rights of US colonies."

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN

Green candidate database and campaign information: http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml
Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml
Green Party Speakers Bureau http://www.gp.org/speakers
Green Party ballot access page http://www.gp.org/ballotstatus
Green Party Livestream Channel http://www.livestream.com/greenpartyus

Green Pages: The official publication of record of the Green Party of the United States (Fall 2010 issue now online)
http://gp.org/greenpages-blog


MGP ANNUAL MEETING 2009

THE 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MONTANA GREEN PARTY WILL BE HELD ON SATURDAY, JUNE 20TH AT 10AM, FOLLOWED BY A POTLUCK LUNCH.

MGP COORDINATOR TOM ELPEL HAS INVITED THE GROUP TO MEET AT THE NEW PASSIVE SOLAR STONE HOUSE THAT WAS BUILT FOR THE GREEN UNIVERSITY INTERNSHIP PROGRAM IN SILVER STAR, MT. SILVER STAR IS 17 MILES SOUTH OF WHITEHALL.

ALL INTERESTED PEOPLE ARE WELCOME.

THE AGENDA IS BEING DISCUSSED ON THE MGP LISTSERV. ANYONE WANTING TO JOIN THE MGP AND THE LISTSERV SHOULD CLICK ON "JOIN US" AND FILL IN THEIR INFORMATION. THEY WILL RECEIVE A WELCOME EMAIL AND AN INVITATION TO JOIN THE LISTSERV.

AGENDA DETAILS WILL BE POSTED AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE.

From the MGP Coordinator:

Possible Agenda:

- Elections: I hope we have enough participants and volunteers to fill the
posts.

- Bylaws & Platform: Do we need to update the bylaws and platform?

- Looking Forward: I propose that we skip the 2010 elections and focus
immediately on the 2012 elections. Who is interested in running? We need to start planning now, not in 2012.

- Radical Strategies to Get Noticed: We are not going to make any progress
if we run the same kind of campaigns as the Democrats and Republicans, but with a whole lot less money. We have to distinguish ourselves as different.

Is anyone familiar with the book Guerrilla Gardening: A Manualfesto? It
is about people taking personal responsibility for their environment and making it better--even if they do not have permission to do so. For example, sometimes people go out at night and secretly plant trees in vacant lots, city parks, neighbors yards, or street right-of-ways. If tastefully done, then people most often appreciate these random acts of kindness and proceed to care for the trees. This is a strategy that would definitely get media attention.

Another idea, although less practical, is to get permission from the owner
of an ugly cinderblock building along a main street, to paint a free mural to beautify the city, along with permission to hang a temporary banner taking
credit for the effort to beautify the city.

In other words, if we are going to distinguish ourselves from the other
parties, then we must get beyond words and convey our message through actions. People will believe that.

What other innovative ideas can you think of to put the Montana Green Party
on the map? Bring your ideas to the annual meeting and let's see where it goes.

- Focusing our Message: In politics, as in business, we must provide what
the customer wants. What we seek as Greens is irrelevant to getting elected. I am not suggesting that we compromise our ideals, but rather that we identify what the customer wants, and suggest a Green path to provide it. Issues that are important to Greens, but not to the average voter, are irrelevant in the campaign. They can always be dealt with later. Let's focus the message.

These are my initial thoughts for the Annual Meeting Agenda. Please
suggest additional or alternative items for the
agenda.

We will also offer a tour of the passive solar stone house we built for our
Green University, LLC internship program, and have a potluck. Please invite your friends.

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Elpel
http://www.hollowtop.com


SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE

Greens note victory for the universal health care movement after the White House, in a reversal, invites Single-payer advocates to its March 5 health summit

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release:
Friday, March 6, 2009

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, cell 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Issues & Answers for the media on Single-payer universal health care

WASHINGTON, DC -- Green Party leaders called the White House's reversal on excluding Single-payer advocates from a March 5 health care policy summit a modest but important victory for universal health care.

The Green Party of the United States is one of several organizations supporting Single-payer health care that urged its members and the public to demand an invitation for advocates of Single-payer/Medicare For All, who until Wednesday evening had been barred from the summit (http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=188).

"The Obama Administration's reversal proves that if enough Americans speak out for real universal health care, we won't be ignored. Unfortunately, President Obama's welcoming remarks on Thursday showed that he won't stand up to the insurance lobby. He won't admit that the private insurance industry adds nothing of value to our health care system, while greatly increasing health care costs and impeding the delivery of health care," said Mark Dunlea, former chair of Green Party of New York State, currently co-chair of Single Payer New York.

"One of our greatest obstacles is the lack of media coverage for Single-payer, because too many in the media have been subject to pressure by politicians and the HMO-insurance industry, which exercises leverage through advertising contracts and underwriting," added Mr. Dunlea.

On Thursday morning, Green Party members learned that the White House had relented after receiving numerous complaints, and invited two Single-payer advocates: Dr. Oliver Fein, president of Physicians for a National Health Program (http://www.pnhp.org) and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the author and main sponsor of HR 676, legislation for Single-payer program (http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/h676_ih.xml).

Until Dr. Fein and Rep. Conyers were invited, the 120 guests at the meeting included lobbyists for the for-profit insurance industry, as well as members of Congress, including Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus, who has declared the Single-payer "off the table." Physicians for a National Health Program, other members of the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Health Care, and the National Single Payer Alliance led the call for President Obama to invite Single-payer leaders.

Issues & Answers for the media: facts about Single-payer national health care (also called Medicare For All)

How Single-payer works:

* Everybody in, nobody out: Single-payer covers every American regardless of employment, income, ability to pay, age, and prior medical condition. Right now, about 48 million Americans have no health coverage at all and millions more have inadequate coverage. Under Single-payer, they will all enjoy guaranteed quality health care, including prescriptions.

* In a Single-payer system, no American will face financial ruin because of illness or injury. Private HMOs and health insurance companies raise their profit margin by denying treatment to people with medical emergencies and by denying coverage to those they consider 'high-risk' because of existing health problems, age, low income, etc. In other words, private health insurance is designed to fail people who need health care the most.

* Single-payer will allow Americans to choose which physician, health care provider, and health care facility will treat them.

* Single-payer will cut national health care costs by as much as a third and reduce what working Americans pay for health coverage. Single-payer will be funded at the federal level and administered at the state level. Americans will pay for Single-payer the way we now pay for Social Security, but the amount working Americans will pay will be far less than for private health coverage, because Single-payer eliminates the profit-making insurance and HMO 'middle-men.'

* Single-payer reduces paperwork for physicians and other health professionals, one reason why thousands of MDs, other people working in the health care industry, and medical students have endorsed Single-payer.

* Under Single-payer, physicians, hospitals, and other health care providers would compete to serve the public, raising the quality of health care. Single-payer is a health insurance payment mechanism, not a health care delivery system.

* Health care rationing? All health care plans ration care to some extent. Under private insurance programs, treatment is rationed according to ability to pay for coverage. Under Single-payer, the insurance company profit motive is removed and health care is rationed according to need, with medical emergencies and serious illnesses receiving top priority.

Single-payer and the economy:

* Single-payer makes economic sense. At 3% administrative cost, Medicare (which would be made universal under Single-payer) is highly efficient compared to the 15-30% administrative costs of for-profit insurance.

* Single-payer will boost the ailing US economy and provide relief for businesses large and small, since it will cancel the high expense and administrative burden of employer-based health care benefits (http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=158).

* Single-payer will relieve municipalities and school boards from having to bear the cost of providing health insurance to employees, allowing responsible officials to reduce their budgets and lower local property taxes.

* Single-payer gives government (and therefore taxpayers) a stake in preventive medicine and promotion of good health habits to keep costs down.

The politics of Single-payer:

* Polls have demonstrated popular support for a national health care program that guarantees universal coverage (http://www.wpasinglepayer.org/PollResults.html). In 2008, the US Conference of Mayors endorsed Single-payer (http://www.usmayors.org/resolutions/76th_conference/chhs_03.asp).

* The US is the only industrial democracy that does not guarantee every citizen health care. Compared to other nations, America has the best medical technology but poor access to medical treatment. Single-payer will correct this scandal.

* The Center for Responsive Politics has documented the millions in campaign money that the insurance industry has given to Democrats and Republicans to maintain their control over health care (http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F09), with a total of $46,002,881 in insurance lobby contributions in 2008.

* The Green Party endorses Single-payer in its national platform. The Democratic Party endorsed national health insurance in 1948, but removed it from the Democratic platform during the Clinton Administration. The Democratic and Republican parties continue to embrace failed 'market solutions.'

* Barack Obama, before he launched his bid for president, supported Single-payer (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE&feature=player_embedded). Al Gore opposed Single-payer when he ran for president in 2000, but admitted two years later that Single-payer is the best plan (http://www.pnhp.org/news/2002/november/gore_favors_single.php). Dennis Kucinich was the only Democratic presidential candidate in 2008 to support Single-payer.

* "Single-payer health care is socialism!" By the same standard, so are public streets, sidewalks, parks, schools, libraries, fire departments, police forces, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and bailouts for ailing Wall Street firms. The principle behind Single-payer is that health care should be a human right, not a commodity that allows powerful corporations that don't actually provide health care (HMOs and insurance companies) to make money.

See also "Single-Payer FAQ" at the Physicians for a National Health Program web site (http://www.pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_faq.php).

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN
Fax 202-319-7193

Tally of Green election victories http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/election-results.html
Green candidate news http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/candidate-news.php
Green candidate database for 2008 and other campaign information: http://www.gp.org/elections.shtml
Green Party News Center http://www.gp.org/newscenter.shtml
Green Party Speakers Bureau http://www.gp.org/speakers
Green Party ballot access page http://www.gp.org/2008-elections

"The First 100 Days: What Would a Green Administration Look Like?" (video and text) http://www.gp.org/first100

Green Party information page on Single-Payer http://www.gp.org/organize/sicko.html

"President Obama can either work to enact health care for all Americans or he can support insurance and HMO industry profits, say Greens"
Green Party press release, January 29, 2009
http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=174

"An International Perspective on Health Care Reform"
By Connecticut Green Party member John R. Battista, MD
http://www.gp.org/first100/?p=119
(Published on the Green Party's web site as part of "The First 100 Days: What Would a Green Administration Look Like?" http://www.gp.org/first100)

Video clips:
2008 Green presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney speaks on Single-Player health care and racial health care disparities http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEHd4lRVUuU
More on health care: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEHd4lRVUuU
Health, the environment, and the economy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVNTOa8owQQ

"Talking Points: Why the mandate plans won't work, and why Single-Payer 'Medicare for All' is what we need"
By Len Rodberg, PhD, Physicians for a National Health Program
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2008/december/talking_points_why_.php

"Albany Med chief [CEO of the Albany Medical Center] calls for hospital reform and single-payer system"
The Business Review (Albany, New York), September 8, 2006
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2006/september/albany_med_chief_cal.php

Green Pages, Vol. 13, No. 1
The official publication of record of the Green Party of the United States
http://gp.org/greenpages-blog

~ END ~

___

Disclaimer: State, local, and candidate press releases made available here represent the opinions of the original source only. Opinions expressed by a state party or candidate do not necessarily represent the views of the Green Party of the United States. State party contact information, when provided with candidate releases, does not imply state party endorsement of the opinions expressed nor of the candidate (prior to gaining formal nomination by the party).
___

Office: PO Box 57065 Washington, D.C. 20037
Email: GPHQ--at--gp.org 202-319-7191 or toll-free (US): 866-41GREEN


GREENS OFFER SIX BIG STEPS FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY

Greens Offer Six Big Steps For Economic Recovery

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

For Immediate Release:
Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, cell 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Greens support workers occupying a factory in Chicago after layoff: bailout money isn't being used to help working Americans

WASHINGTON, DC -- Green Party leaders said today that the incoming Obama Administration and Congress should take six major steps to reverse the financial meltdown and restore financial security for Americans.

The steps include a Green public works program, aid for state and muncipal governments, expansion of mass transit, Single-Payer health care, a peace dividend gained by ending the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and an end to the wasteful war on drugs.

Green Party candidates running for local, state, and national office in 2008 promoted many of these ideas even before the crisis precipitated. In September, Cynthia McKinney published a ten-point list of solutions and reforms in response to the Wall Street meltdown, titled "Seize the Time" (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/learn/mckinney-messages).

Greens expressed support for United Electrical Workers union members occupying a Republic Windows and Doors plant in Chicago after the plant was shut down and they were laid off with three days' notice and told they had no assurance of receiving severance and unused vacation pay. The company's creditor, Bank of America, received $25 billion from the government's financial bailout package. Greens said that the bank's actions, including refusal to allow Republic to give workers 60 days notice (as required by law), demonstrates how bailout money isn't being used to assist working Americans facing financial hardship.

Six Green steps for economic recovery:

(1) Enact a massive Green public works program, creating new living-wage jobs in conservation (including weatherization and energy retro-fitting); clean and safe energy technologies to replace fossil fuel and nuclear sources and create a carbon-free economy; repair and improvement of America's deteriorating infrastructure (especially water and sewer systems); and improvement of public schools and Green job training programs.

"The collapse of the I-35 bridge in Minneapolis in 2007 was a result of the neglect and starvation of funds for maintaining infrastructure that was built decades ago. The ideology of privatization and hostility to 'big government' is no longer tenable during the financial crisis -- the current White House and Congress conceded as much when they began pushing for bailouts. Public works programs built America, and public works, with hundreds of thousands of new Green jobs, is what America needs now for economic recovery," said Rosa Clemente, the Green Party's 2008 candidate for Vice President (http://www.rosaclemente.com).

"We're encouraged that President-elect Obama intends to launch a public works program along these basic lines, but we hope Congress and his own administration don't undermine and dilute such a program out of traditional Democratic and Republican loyalty to corporate interests and fear of being labeled liberal or socialist. It's time to follow the lead of the Green Jobs For All movement," Ms. Clemente added.

(2) Bail out financially ailing towns, cities, and states before bailing out private corporations: millions of public sector and contractor jobs depend on the fiscal security of municipal and state governments.

Greens noted that municipalities and states are businesses that drive state and local economies throughout the US. They also provide the social safety net that millions of working people need during the current crisis.

(3) Jumpstart our country's mass transit system, giving people an alternative to cars while saving them money and providing jobs.

"Making autos more efficient will only get us part way toward solving our energy and climate challenges. We need to get people out of their cars altogether. Communities need the ability to provide local solutions for mass transprotation: new trains, subways, light rail wherever they fit," said Wes Rolley, co-chair of the Green Party's EcoAction Committee.

(4) Enact a Single-Payer/Medicare For All national health plan, providing every American with coverage and removing the burden of health care from small and large private businesses.

"The skyrocketing cost of health care under our private health care system has created much of the economic instability as businesses struggle to provide workers health benefits. If President Obama and Congress have the political will to resist the power of the insurance, HMO, and pharmaceutical industries that siphon their profits off America's need for health care, the relief that Single-Payer will be a huge economic boost," said Sanda Everette, co-chair of the Green Party of the United States.

Single-Payer would cover all Americans regardless of income, employment, residence, age, or prior medical condition, allowing choice of health care provider, and costing working people far less than they now pay for private coverage. In 2003, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article estimating that Single-Payer could cut health care costs by $350 billion annually (http://www.pnhp.org/publications/nejmadmin.pdf). Greens sharply criticized Barack Obama during the election season for rejecting Single-Payer out of concern for health insurance companies.

(5) End the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

"The staggering expense of the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions and occupations haven't only cost American, Iraqi, and Afghan lives. It also ate up trillions of dollars away that could have been spent on human and environmental needs. If we call home our troops right now, we can divert the money needed for military occupations to Green public works and other programs to jumpstart the economy -- a new peace dividend," said Starlene Rankin, co-chair of the Lavender Green Caucus.

The Green Party opposed both wars from the beginning and has criticized Mr. Obama's plans for delayed and partial troop withdrawal from Iraq and for sending more troops to Afghanistan.

(6) End the war on drugs, which wastes billions annually, hasn't curbed drug use, and ruins lives by incarcerating nonviolent offenders (mostly young, African American, Latino, and poor white) at further government expense.

"The war on drugs is America's longest and costliest war. With Afghanistan providing the world's world's biggest poppy crop, it's one of the main reasons the US is fighting a war there," said Cliff Thornton, co-chair of the Green Party and co-founder of Efficacy, Inc. (http://www.efficacy-online.org), which promotes major reforms in drug policy.

Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron has estimated that legalizing cannabis would save federal, state, and local governments $44 billion a year in enforcement costs (http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/mironreport.html). Governments could collect another $33 billion in revenues by taxing cannabis as heavily as alcohol and tobacco.

MORE INFORMATION

Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org
202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN
Fax 202-319-7193


RESULTS

Cynthia McKinney received 152,811 or .02% of the votes and was #6
Ralph Nader received 698,798 or 1% of the votes and was #3

Results from cbsnews.com


WRITE IN MCKINNEY FOR PRESIDENT

Cynthia McKinney has filed and been accepted to run as a write-in candidate for President in Montana. She was nominated as the candidate for President for the Green Party of the United States at their convention last July. Her running mate is Rosa Clemente.

Even though the Montana Green Party was unable to regain ballot access, Cynthia has made it possible for Greens in Montana to vote for one Green candidate. At the end of the list of Presidential candidates, print Cynthia McKinney. Rosa Clemente is also filed as a Vice Presidential candidate, so you may also vote for her below Cynthia McKinney. Be sure to print clearly.

GO GREENS!


CYNTHIA MCKINNEY FOR PRESIDENT

CYNTHIA MCKINNEY FOR PRESIDENT

The Green Party of the United States nominated Cynthia McKinney to run for the office of President of the United States at their convention in Chicago last July. She chose Rosa Clemente as her running mate. Below are some comparisons on issues between McKinney/Clemente and Obama/Biden. This information was obtained from the GPUS website, www.gp.org

Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

McKinney/Clemente

* call for US troops to be brought home safe and sound, with an immediate and orderly withdrawal of all US military and contracted personnel from Iraq. The Green Party and Green candidates opposed the invasion and occupation since the Bush Administration announced its intention to wage war on Iraq.

* have urged Congress to cut off funding for the war.

* would hold the Bush Administration responsible for deceiving the public with false claims that Saddam Hussein possessed WMDs, posed a threat to the US and to Iraq's own neighbors, had conspired with al Qaeda, and played a role in the 9/11 attacks.

* have opposed 'benchmarks' that would allow US and UK corporations to take control over most Iraqi oil resources.

* support an end to the US occupation of Afghanistan.

Video: Cynthia McKinney speaks on economics and war spending http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOFb_I6xpzI
Rep. McKinney grills Defense Sec. Donald Rumsfeld on the FY 2006 defense budget (May 2005) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eootfzAhAoU

Obama/Biden

* offer a delayed timetable for partial troop withdrawal, and would leave private US military personnel and tens of thousands of troops in Iraq to protect "American interests"(Iraqi oil resources), as well as expand US combat forces in surrounding nations. The Democratic Party leadership supported the Iraq War from the beginning, believing Bush Administration deceptions, and voted with Republicans to surrender Congress's war power to the White House.

* continued to vote for President Bush's requests for more war funding. Democrats, including Mr. Obama, approved all war funding bills after gaining control of Congress in 2006, despite their claim of opposition to the Iraq War.

* have supported 'benchmarks' giving US and UK corporations control over Iraqi oil, which would require continued US troop presence in Iraq to protect corporate interests. In recent campaign ads, Mr. Obama's language about US access to Iraqi oil confirms the Democrats' occupation-for-oil agenda.

* support continued US occupation and war on Afghanistan: Mr. Obama called for more troops to be sent to Afghanistan.

Foreign and Military Policy

McKinney/Clemente

* would slash the US military budget, reducing it to the amount needed for defense of US, and redirect the savings to human needs.

* strongly oppose President Bush's threats to attack Iran.

* support cutoff of military aid to Israel, and demand US pressure on Israel to end the brutal occupation of Palestine and suppression of Palestinian and Israeli Arab human rights, in accord with international law and UN directives.

* oppose manipulation by the Bush Administration and NATO of the Russia-Georgia conflict in order to isolate Russia and jump-start a new Cold War, citing White House approval and assistance for Georgia's invasion of Ossetia.

* seek an end to the US embargo of Cuba

* favor nonviolent solutions to international conflict.

Obama/Biden

* support a huge military budget, voted for increases in military funding.

* have signed on to President Bush's threat to attack Iran, repeating White House misinformation about Iran's nuclear capabilities and embracing Bush-Cheney doctrine of preemptive warfare.

* avoid criticizing Israel and dismiss international law and UN directives on Israeli apartheid and occupation of Palestinian lands; would maintain a foreign policy that conforms to Israel's regional military objectives.

* endorse most of the Bush Administration line on the Russia-Georgia conflict.

* favor a continued US embargo of Cuba.

Global Warming, Energy, and the Environment

McKinney/Clemente

* call for far-reaching short-term and long-term cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and favor major conservation programs to cut US energy consumption

* seek widespread economic reorganization and millions of new jobs in conservation and conversion to safe, clean energy sources.

* oppose nuclear energy, which creates huge amounts of toxic waste and multiple security risks, and off-shore drilling, and favor a ban on new coal fired-power plants and all mountaintop coal removal.

* oppose widespread conversion to biofuels that require agricultural land needed for food production.

Video: Ms. McKinney on health, the environment, and economics http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVNTOa8owQQ
Press release: http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=86

Obama/Biden

* favor modest long-term cuts in greenhouse gas emissions and ineffective corporate polluter-friendly carbon emissions trading schemes ('cap and trade').

* don't talk about cuts in consumption.

* support nuclear energy, biofuel production, and 'clean coal', and have dropped opposition to off-shore drilling: Sen. Obama receives major campaign contributions from nuclear and ethanol industries and supports their goals.

Impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney

McKinney/Clemente

* endorse impeachment of Bush and Cheney for high crimes and misdemeanors: deception and manipulation of intelligence to justify the invasion of Iraq; cover-ups of information about impending 9/11 attacks; use of torture; denial of habeas corpus and due process; warrantless surveillance of US citizens; hundreds of 'signing statements' to exempt the President from executing over 1,000 federal laws; censoring and tampering with scientific research to conceal the seriousness of global warming; responsibility for the deaths of as many as one million Iraqi civilians and over 4,000 US servicemembers. Ms. McKinney was the first member of Congress to introduce a motion for impeachment, in 2006.

* opposed the 'telecomm immunity' bill blocking prosecution of telecommunications companies that allowed warrantless spying on US citizens.

* call for a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

* support establishment of an International Criminal Court to prosecute war crimes.

Obama/Biden

* oppose motions for impeachment, despite Bush Administration's numerous crimes and abuses of power. The Democratic Party leadership has blocked efforts to pursue impeachment.

* voted for the telecomm immunity bill.

* do not support a new, independent investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

* are silent on establishing an International Criminal Court.

The War on Drugs

McKinney/Clemente

* oppose the War on Drugs, calling it a war on African American, Latino, poor, and young people. They favor legalization of marijuana and medical treatment for drug use and abuse instead of prosecution.

Obama/Biden

* support the War on Drugs. Mr. Obama will continue the Andean Counterdrug Initiative, which has funded US assistance for repressive police and military forces in seven South American countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Venezuela) since 2001.

The Justice System

McKinney/Clemente

* have spoken out strongly against police and court abuses, including the Sean Bell case, the Jena Six, and the Mumia Abu Jamal case.

* oppose privatization of prisons, which has created a new industry demanding increasing numbers of inmates for corporate profits. As a result of the Prison-Industrial Complex, the US incarcerates more citizens than any other country in the world.

* call for abolition of the death penalty.

Obama/Biden

* remain silent or have equivocated on many cases of police and court abuses.

* are silent on the privatization of the prison system.

* support the death penalty.

Human Rights

McKinney/Clemente

* would repeal the USA Patriot Act, Secret Evidence Act, and Military Commissions Act.

* have spoken out for the rights of survivors of Katrina in 2005. Ms. McKinney was directly involved in efforts on behalf of people in New Orleans and has criticized bipartisan policies that have displaced thousands of poor and African American residents in the wake of the hurricane (http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=94). She joined the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, disobeying Democratic leadership's call for Democrats to boycott the committee.

* support full and equal recognition for same-sex marriage.

* support full reproductive rights.

* support reparations for the descendents of African American slaves in the US.

* support statehood for the District of Columbia, with self-determination and full representation in Congress equal to other states (http://www.dcstatehoodgreen.org).

Obama/Biden

* support the USA Patriot Act (Mr. Obama voted for reauthorization).

* were not involved in assistance for Gulf Coast residents in Katrina aftermath.

* favor limited and unequal recognition for same-sex couples.

* would allow states to restrict late-term 'partial birth' abortion.

* do not support reparations for the descendents of slaves.

* favor the 'DC Vote': a single voting seat in the US House for DC. Statehood for DC was removed from the Democratic Party's national platform in 2004.

Democracy and Election Integrity

McKinney/Clemente

* take no money from corporate contributors.

* have spoken out against the Republican theft of the 2000 and 2004 elections: see Ms. McKinney's documentary 'American Blackout' (http://www.americanblackout.com). Greens led effort to expose Republican obstruction of African American and young voters and manipulation of votes in Ohio and New Mexico in 2004 (http://www.iwantmyvote.com).

* seek public financing of elections, free time on public airwaves for all candidates, repeal of ballot access laws restricting third party and independent candidates.

* support instant runoff voting, proportional representation, and other reforms to ensure democracy in US elections.

Obama/Biden

* have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars from corporate contributors (http://www.opensecrets.org).

* have not responded to election irregularities in Ohio in 2004 or to the Conyers Commission's evidence that the 2004 election may have been stolen.

* are silent on many needed election reforms. Democrats and Republicans have together worked to pass laws limiting third party and independent participation in elections.

Health Care Reform

McKinney/Clemente

* support Single-Payer National Health Care (Medicare For All: see http://www.pnhp.org), which would provide all Americans with quality health care regardless of ability to pay, employment, age, or prior medical condition. Single-Payer will remove HMOs and insurance firms from control over health care, give Americans choice of health care provider, provide no-cost or low-cost prescriptions based on need, and ease the burden on physicians and other health care providers. Under Single-Payer, working people will pay for less for coverage, and no American will go bankrupt because of health care costs.

Video clips: Cynthia McKinney speaks on Single-Player health care and racial health care disparities http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEHd4lRVUuU
More on health care: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEHd4lRVUuU
Health, the environment, and the economy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVNTOa8owQQ

Obama/Biden

* reject Single-Payer. They favor reforms that fall short of universal care, fail to reduce the high costs that Americans pay for health care compared to the rest of the world, and leave HMOs and insurance firms in control over health care. The HMO and insurance industry profits by excluding people from coverage and limiting treatment for those who are covered. Mr. Obama has taken major contributions from corporate HMO, insurance, and pharmaceutical contributors (http://www.opensecrets.org).

Labor & Economic Justice

McKinney/Clemente

* oppose 'free trade' agreements and unelected international trade authorities (NAFTA, CAFTA, WTO, GATT, 'Fast Track', etc.) that give corporate power and profit priority over labor rights and environmental protections; Ms. McKinney has voted against these agreements and advocates withdrawal.

* support democratic workplaces and repeal of the Taft-Hartley Act (restrictions on union organizing).

* support human rights protections and amnesty for undocumented immigrants, an end to raids, and tearing down the border wall. They call the flood of new immigrants a result of economic policies and agreements (e.g., NAFTA) that impoverish people and drive them across borders.

* favor a strong safety net for middle- and low-income working people and families, with support for Main Street (small businesses and local economies) instead of Wall Street, and a massive transfer of federal funding from military contract and war spending to human needs.
Video: Cynthia McKinney on labor and corporations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meyaVgkWV2g
Ms. McKinney on the economy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQJaj5hyFH0

Obama/Biden

* support amended 'free trade' agreements and unelected international trade authorities; Mr. Biden voted for many such agreements and for 'Fast Track' presidential trade authority.

* are silent on Taft-Hartley. The Democratic Party has failed to deliver for working people despite Election Year endorsements from unions.

* Favor immigration reform but Mr. Obama voted yes on the border wall and more border policing and surveillance.

* support many economic policies that favor the wealthy, major corporations, and Wall Street, with limited aid for poor and middle-income Americans. Mr. Obama has praised the 1996 Welfare Reform Act signed by Bill Clinton, which severely hurt millions of Americans, especially women, during the recent economic downturn, and supports Bush-agenda 'faith-based' initiatives. Mr. Biden helped draft the 2005 bankruptcy bill that gave credit-card companies and other financial institutions greater power over Americans facing economic difficulties. See "Obama is flat-out kicking McCain's ass when it comes to Wall Street contributions" ("Candidates for Sale" by Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone, August 21, 2008, http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/22210615/candidates_for_sale)


GREEN PRIMARY RESULTS

GREEN PRIMARY RESULTS

These are the current results in the states where the Green Party had primaries:

Candidate........% of votes

Arkansas

Jared Ball.......10.55
Cynthia McKinney.20.32
Kent Mesplay.....8.05
Kat Swift........5.8

Uncommitted......55.28

California

Jared Ball.......1.6
Elaine Brown.....4.6
Jesse Johnson....1.8
Cynthia McKinney.25.9
Kent Mesplay.....2.0
Ralph Nader......61.1
Kat Swift........3.0

Illinois

Jared Ball.......12
Howie Hawkins....17
(stand-in for Ralph Nader)
Cynthia McKinney.57
Kent Mesplay.....14

Massachusetts

Not yet available


FIRST 2008 GP PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

FIRST 2008 GP PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

from acgreens.org)

THANKS FOR THE MEMORIES!!

It was a brilliant event! 800 attendees, nearly a full house, in one of the nicest venues in San Francisco, the historic Herbst. All the candidates appeared at their best, and were exceptional on stage. All great spokespersons, and fine examples of the Green movement. The Great Green Debate made the local TV news and newspapers, and will be shown in part on Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now this coming week. Thanks to Mike Feinstein’s crew, it will soon (in one or two days) be available in documentary format on YouTube. And KPFA radio’s full 3-hour taping of the event, with Green MC Aimee Allison and political analyst Larry Bensky will air Tuesday night, 7 pm (Pacific Time), on 94.1 FM in the Bay Area, and live streaming for the world online at www.kpfa.org . Listen in and see for yourself what the Green Party can look like, in the proper setting. Superb!

For more information go to http://www.acgreens.org/debate

The debate was sponsored by the Green Party of Alameda County, the San Francisco Green Party, the Sacramento County Green Party and endorsed by the Green Party of San Mateo County.

Videos of the debates are at:

http://www.gp.org/2008-elections/presidential-videos.php

__________________________________________________________


GREENS RESPOND TO RALPH NADER'S DECISION

Press Release of the GPUS

Greens respond to Ralph Nader's decision not to seek the Green Party nomination

GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.gp.org

Friday, February 29, 2008

Contacts:
Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, cell 202-904-7614, mclarty@greens.org
Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@gp.org

Party leaders wish Mr. Nader well in his campaign, affirm that the Green Party will choose nominees at the Green National Convention in Chicago, July 10-13

WASHINGTON, DC -- Green Party leaders expressed their disappointment in Ralph Nader's decision, announced on Thursday, not to seek the 2008 Green presidential nomination.

"A lot of Greens have supported Mr. Nader and wanted him to win the party's nomination. There has been an active effort by many Green leaders to 'draft' Mr. Nader as a Green candidate, and his success in recent Green primaries demonstrates that he remains a very popular figure within the Green Party. There is widespread disappointment among Greens that he chose to go a different route," said Phil Huckelberry, co-chair of the Green Party of the United States.

Four candidates are seeking the Green nomination, which will be decided at the Green Party's National Convention in Chicago, July 10-13. Jesse Johnson, Cynthia McKinney, Kent Mesplay, and Kat Swift are touring the US and meeting Greens and other voters.

"The Green Party intends to run a ticket of Green nominees, and we're working hard to get their names on the ballot lines of every state and the District of Columbia. We look forward to party unity behind our nominees. We wish Ralph Nader and [running mate] Matt Gonzalez well in their independent campaign," said Clifford Thornton, also a co-chair of the Green Party.

Currently, 21 state Green Parties hold ballot access within their respective states, and Greens anticipate adding Arizona to the list soon. Five state Green Parties have participated in primaries; other Green Parties are measuring preference for presidential candidates through caucuses and statewide meetings.

Mr. Nader ran as the Green nominee in 1996 and 2000. In 2004, David Cobb won the Green nomination, while Mr. Nader ran as an independent.


DENNIS KUCHINICH IS TOO SHORT

DENNIS KUCHINICH IS TOO SHORT

by Parris ja Young

Why gather signatures?

What, exactly, is wrong?

Putting it shortly, the repugnicans are great with party loyalty and political arts, even at the cost of honesty and ethics. They fail to behave with spiritual values, integrity, sympathy for public welfare or the will of the People. They have had absolute power for seven years.

The democracks — AKA the "Corps of Co-opters” — say the right social words, but lack cohesiveness (AKA leadership), courage and political savvy. They have yet to figure out that simply standing tall and firm against repugnican values would win them a platform with some form and substance. We must conclude this party is nearly as plutocratic as the other. They have had no political traction for seven years and have yet to figure out why.

The dems are offering small choice for the future. First there is Barack Obama, who is the opposite of a scape goat — carrying all the hopes of conventional folks — has shown, the few times he has been put to the test, a glimmer of efficacy, but not that much promise. Hillary Clinton, the other best choice, co-opted herself out of consideration by favoring the war in Iraq early on when it was clear even to the most casual observer that the war was an act of empire-building imperialism.

The one democrat that has been right from the start and sticks to his guns is Dennis Kucinich. But he is too short to be President, isn't he?

In other words, both parties have failed us.

What can we do? The only way to have a party that serves the people is to have a party of the people.

And who is that? It is us.

It's up to us. It's going to be a long and arduous climb, but we can achieve our ends one step at a time.

Let's start with this: gather signatures.

The first thing that will do is convince you that people are sympathetic to our cause. Some years ago I went out stumping for Ralph Nader. Nearly every household in Mineral County favored the Green Party, but few were going to vote Green because it didn't look “politically realistic”.

The more we are out there, the more we present a unified front, the more folks will give us the nod.

Let's.


STATE REPORT FOR MONTANA GREEN PARTY 2007

This is the report sent to the Green Pages, which is published by the GPUS. It should be in the Summer edition. Below is the new MGP Logo, drawn by Steve Kelly. Thank you very much, Steve.

STATE REPORT FOR MONTANA GREEN PARTY

It's been a busy Spring out here in Montana. We are very happy to have been accredited by the GPUS this year. It will be great to have representation on the GNC.

We had our Annual Meeting in Bozeman on April 21st. We took a break to join the Bozeman Peace Seekers in their regular Saturday Peace event. Then we returned to the library and continued our discussions while eating lunch.

The main focus of our meeting was our signature drive to get back on the ballot. We need 5000 signatures, which doesn't sound like much, but we have less than a million people in Montana. Too bad cows can't sign.

Steve Kelly, our co-ordinator and an artist, drew a logo for us. It will be on a brochure that we will give out when collecting signatures. The brochure will also contain the Ten Key Values, a short history of the MGP, the website address, and a form for people to join the party and to give money.

We also identified three issues that would be important for Montana, and that would be good for candidates to talk about:
Single Payor Health Care
Energy efficiency - what individuals can do, including more
energy effecient houses
Fast Track

We discussed candidates, but we need to get our signatures in before making final decisions.
MGP Logo Color VersionMGP Logo Color Version


Montana Green Party Annual Meeting 2007

2007 MONTANA GREEN PARTY ANNUAL MEETING

Date: Saturday, April 21 10 am -3 pm (working lunch provided)

Where: Bozeman Public Library, "The Board Room" (upstairs) Address: Broadway and E Main

Who: Montana Green Party members and all interested persons

Draft Agenda

* Introductions

* Update the Party platform. Hopefully, much of this will be accomplished in advance on the listserv.

* Discuss ballot access drive. Distribute forms. Do we want to keep the same five words that describe our Party on the form?

* Ballot initiatives? Instant Voter Runoff? Or, should we write a ballot initiative eliminating the signature requirement for small parties and independents to run for office. Washington (state) has a similar law.

* A brochure or flyer to distribute when gathering signatures. A Party membership form. Both need a coupon or mailer for supporters who wish to contribute funds.

* A Party logo? Bring sketches and ideas that can be used on letterhead, bumper-stickers and t-shirts.

* Candidates for 2008.

* Elect officers.

* Elect 2 delegates and 2 alternates to national (G.P.U.S.).

Map: http://www.dexonline.com/detailsmap.ds


GPUS Votes to Accredit Montana Green Party

The vote count was 82-0, with 1 abstention from a Texas delegate. The Green National Committee has voted to accredit the Montana Green Party!

As a new affiliate, the Montana Green Party gets to have two
delegates and two alternate delegates elected to the Green National Committee.

Most GNC discussion and voting happens online, with the exception of our Annual National Meeting. Most committees of the GNC have phone conference calls.

This year's Annual National Meeting will be in Reading, PA, July 12-15.

Congratulations, and good luck on the petition drive!


Are you in favor of Single Payer Health Care?

GPUS Presidential Candidates for 2008

Presidential Candidate Forum at the GPUS 2007 Convention:

http://wilderside.wordpress.com/2007/07/18/daily-greens-green-party-presidential-candidate-forum/

You can also go to http://youtube.com and search for the candidate's name.

The following people want to be the Presidential candidate for the GPUS in 2008:


BALL, JARED

Website:

http://www.voxunion.com/jaredball/

Jared BallJared Ball

Jared Ball has withdrawn from the race, and supports Cyhthia McKinny. See statement on his website.
_____________________________________________________

ATTENTION: OUR ALLIES OF CULTURE AND CONSCIOUS!

This coming Monday, September 10th 2007 there
will be a 'Meet and Greet'
fellowship/information/fundraising event at
Sangha in Takoma Park, MD to support prominent
nationally recognized progressive Scholar,
Educator, Journalist, Pacifica Radio talk show
host, and DC activist Dr. Jared Ball's campaign
effort (http://www.jaredbforpresident.com) to
earn him the 2008 Green Party Presidential
Nomination.

This event will take place between the hours of
7-10pm at well known and much beloved Sangha Fair
Trade store , located at
7014 Westmoreland Ave, Takoma Park, MD, on the
eve of it's final day of business in Takoma Park.
We want to extend a very special and hearty
'Thank you!' to Jennifer for opening up her doors
and publicly supporting the Jared Ball for
President: "Don't Hate in 08!" campaign!

Green Party of Maryland co-chair Rob Savidge, and
Takoma Park resident Dave Zirin (nationally
respected Progressive Sportswriter, SLAM Magazine
columnist, Nation Magazine contributor, and award
winning author) will be speaking briefly at this
event.

Entertainment services will be provided by DJ
Eurok's Upset The Set Up! community initiative
(http://www.djeurok.com), with special
performances by nationally renowned progressive
Hip-Hop artist/educator/activist Head-Roc
(http://www.head-roc.com). Light food and wine
will be served throughout the evening until
supplies last.

We invite the entire DC, MD, and VA regional
Progressive community to experience the Capitol
Resistance styled political, social, and economic
information presentations that Dr. Ball and
Head-Roc have been delivering around the country!

For more information on this event, or to find
out how you can join the Jared Ball for
President: "Don't Hate in 08!" campaign please
contact us at capitolresistance@gmail.com.

See you on Monday! THANK YOU!

Head-Roc
Cultural Outreach Coordinator
Jared Ball for President Green Party Nomination
Campaign Committee
(http://www.jaredbforpresident.com) (http://www.JaredBall.com)


BROWN, ELAINE

ELAINE BROWN WITHDRAWS
FROM GREEN PARTY PRESIDENTIAL RACE

E BrownE Brown

Renounces Green Party Membership
_____________________________

OPEN STATEMENT TO THE GREEN PARTY

As of today, I am no longer a candidate for the Green Party nomination for president of the United States, and I hereby resign from all affiliation with the Green Party. I believe the leadership of the Green Party of the United States has been seized by neo-liberal men who entrench the Party in internecine antagonisms so as to compromise its stated principles and frustrate its electoral and other goals. They have made it impossible to advance any truly progressive ideals or objectives under the umbrella of the Green Party, and, thus, rendered it counterproductive for me to go forward as a Green Party candidate or member.

I believe this small clique that has captured control of the Party has transformed it into a repository for erstwhile, disgruntled Democrats, who would violate the Party's own vision and sabotage the good will and genuine commitment of the general membership. Indeed, these usurpers foster a reactionary agenda, supporting partisans in and backers of the Bush wars and disavowing the Party's more progressive tenets in favor of promoting high-profile participation in the politics of the establishment.

This became clear to me almost from the moment I announced my candidacy in February of 2007. I intended using my campaign to bring large numbers of blacks and browns into the Party, particularly from the hood and the barrio-as would come to be reflected in the lists of supporters and delegates I've submitted in connection with my candidacy. As I asserted I would use the respect I enjoyed as a former leader of the Black Panther Party to do so, some in the hierarchy seemed utterly fearful of the prospect of a massive influx of blacks and browns into the Green Party. Soon, there was wide circulation of false rumors that I was a one-time "government agent," which was intended to discredit my history in the Black Panther Party so as to undermine my potential influence.-And, since then, I have had to devote significant time and energy to addressing these lies.-What this effort revealed, though, was how the Green Party, while advocating "diversity," remains dominated by whites. Indeed, the Party is able to count less blacks, browns and natives in its membership than our national population percentages and
certainly less than the Democrats themselves.

In effect, the present Green Party leadership promotes a kinder, gentler capitalism, a moderated racism, an environmentally-sustainable globalism, which I cannot support. They are dedicated to the underside of the Party's platform, which falls short of repudiating the capitalist state, source of all the social ills the Party would address. They equivocate by promoting "an economic alternative to corporate capitalism and a socialist state," advocate a "re-formulation" of the IMF, NAFTA, so forth, and advance the institution of "stakeholder capitalism."

On the other hand, they demonstrate a willingness to override the best of the Party's platform. My sharp criticism of high-profile Party members' support for the "three-strikes" crime laws, the sole basis for the inhumane mass incarceration of people in the United States, particularly blacks-the repeal of which the Party's platform advocates-has been met with outright enmity. And, to divert attention from this and other critical issues, the leadership has employed chicanery in their promulgation of defamatory lies about me-which they finally extended to character assaults on my supporters and critics of their unscrupulousness.

It is my sincere belief that the Green Party as it now exists has no intention of using the ballot to actualize real social progress, and will aggressively repel attempts to do so. To remain in the fray or in the Party, then, would require a betrayal of my lifelong and ongoing commitment to serving the interests of black and other oppressed people by advancing revolutionary change in America.


JOHNSON, JESSE

Speech at GPUS National Meeting

Jesse JohnsonJesse Johnson

Jesse Johnson (Mountain Party, West Virginia) seeks 2008 Green presidential nomination. Speaking on plenary panel to delegates of 2007 annual national meeting of the Green Party of the United States. Reading, Pennsylvania. July 13th, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMxgYnmdHfg

Jesse Johnson's website:

http://www.jesse08.org/

JESSE JOHNSON CAMPAIGN FORMALLY FILES WITH
FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION

Washington, 10 March 2008 - The Committee to
Elect Jesse Johnson formally filed with the FEC
today to officially establish Jesse Johnson as a
candidate for President of the United States from
the Green Party.

Johnson, up until recently the Chairman of the
Mountain Party, the Green Party affiliate in West
Virginia, delayed filing until this time as he
was engaged in securing the ballot line for the
Greens in that state. Lawmakers in West Virginia
threatened to unlawfully withhold the ballot line
due to the Mountain and Green Parties having
dissimilar names - a practice which was not
applied when considering, for example, the
Democrat-Farmer- Labor Party of Minnesota.

In accordance with the opinion as cited by the
Secretary of State, Johnson would have been the
only Green candidate able to run for President in
West Virginia, due to his status in the Mountain
Party. "In acting as he did, Jesse Johnson placed
his party before himself," said co-campaign
manager Joel Brown.

Jesse and his entire campaign staff are
enthusiastic to hit the campaign trail.

"Having fulfilled my promise to deliver our West
Virginia ballot line, I look forward to running a
vigorous and transformational campaign for
President with the Green Party emphasizing party
growth and expansion," Johnson, a seasoned
campaigner and candidate for Governor of West
Virginia in 2004 and U.S. Senator in 2006, said.
"Green values are the values of American
citizens. I intend to gain their votes by
defending our Constitution and our environment
passionately, protecting the jobs and families of
working-class Americans through sensible trade
and health care policies, and ending not only the
war in Iraq, but war as a means of foreign policy
as well as the unforgivable bedrock of our
economy."

More information on the Johnson campaign may be
found online at http://www.jesse08. org

Contact:
Joel Brown, 703 864 5199, joelbrown88@ yahoo.com
Steve Kramer, 240 426 3338,
scooter@the- exchange- us.com


MCKINNEY, CYNTHIA

From: hesco@greens.org (Hugh Esco)
Greens are very much a part of her broad-based movement
Is the Green Party ready for a McKinney Campaign?

Cynthia McKinneyCynthia McKinney
Dear Greens:

I write this to our Party's leadership to ask whether the Green
Party is ready to serve as a vehicle for a Cynthia McKinney
Presidential bid.

I write this from the road on the way back to Atlanta from
New Orleans Louisiana. I traveled to NOLA with Congresswoman
McKinney to honor her commitment as a Convenor of the Peoples
International Tribunal for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

While there, she was approached by International Delegates
from multiple nations often speaking through interpreters,
expressing broadly held hopes from their home countries that
she might lead an electoral challenge to transform our rogue
nation into an honest broker for peace in the world.

We traveled to New Orleans in a twenty-two hour overnight drive
from a Delaware event which ended a thirteen stop speaking
and fundraising tour, largely organized and hosted by Green
Party activists, of New England and the Mid-Atlantic states.
Our intent was to retire what was left of the $50,000 debt
left from her 2006 Congressional Campaign where, for the
second time, a malicious cross-over vote in Georgia's open
primaries served to turn her out of Congress where for six
terms she had provided authentic representation to Georgia's
Fourth District. When we started we still had more to go.
As we return home, although having made a serious dent in
the balance, that debt is not yet retired, but we thank those
contributors who are helping us get where we need her to be
for her full consideration of her options for 2008.

Having worked in her Congressional office on Capitol Hill, I can
say that her constituency stretches across 435 Congressional
districts and that the phones never stopped ringing with
people across this nation seeking a sympathetic ear on the
Hill in spite of their own elected Congressmembers failure to
represent their interests.

A few of you are already aware that I have for much of the
past year, worked quietly in the background to prepare the way
for a Green Party McKinney campaign. Early in that process
it became clear that there would be no such Green Party
campaign unless there were also a Black, Brown and Green,
Green Party McKinney campaign. No declaration would be made
by Congresswoman McKinney for our nomination, unless it could
be a part of a larger effort which was prepared to ride the
momentum being created by the Black-Brown Unity organizing
already under way, led by the Black Liberation Movement and the
Immigrant community. No such effort would materialize unless
it was a part of a larger effort to involve and engage Native
and Asian and African and Latino/a communities in a central
and meaningful way.

The biggest obstacle we as the Green Party face, to having
a role in such an historic and seminal campaign is the white

culture which so dominates our Party. Our biggest obstacle
is the impression among community activists of color that the
Green Party has no place for them at the center of decision
making within the Green Party.

While understanding the historic imperative for urgent action
which we face, Cynthia McKinney also could look back with
pride on sixteen years of service in publicly elected office.
She could choose to retire to complete her long postponed
Doctoral Dissertation. She could choose to have a private
life for nearly the first time in her adult life.

First in the Georgia General Assembly, and later in the
U.S. Congress, McKinney offered herself as a vehicle for the
aspirations of communities struggling for justice against the
corporate and public institutions which continue to undermine
democracy and the living and working conditions we face. It was
the poorest of voters in the Central Georgia Black Belt which
first sent her to Congress on a $25,000 campaign in the three
way 1992 Primary where we defeated the two Black candidates
chosen to represent the predominently Black folks of the old
Eleventh by Georgia's most powerful competing white politicians,
then Governor Zell Miller and then Speaker Tom Murphy. These
were people without running water in their homes. These were
people who faced Klan violence for their support of her.

As former Georgia Green Party Chairman, the Reverend Zack
Lyde often reminded us, the work we do is serious business,
a matter of life and death.

And as Ms. McKinney often reminds people, she is a student
of COINTELPRO, which she asserts did more to shape the
on-the-ground conditions faced today in the Black community
than any other single factor.

It was building black and white unity to challenge racism,
poverty and war which got Dr. King assassinated. And our
own tax dollars had a hand in that, just as they did in the
assassinations of George Jackson, Chairman Fred Hampton,
the Kennedy brothers and Malcolm X.

It is important that we not be naive about the barriers we
face, nor the risks we would ask her to assume. Even so,
the future of our nation and our communities demands that
we not shirk from this historic responsibility to offer the
Party we've spent twenty years building as a vehicle for such
an important campaign.

But to do so we can not sit on our laurels. Having forty or
even fifty-one ballot lines to offer will not be sufficient
if we fail to offer a place at the table for our partners in
such an alliance. And that will require that we step outside
our comfort zones, that we learn to operate effectively and
respectfully in the very communities we seek to represent.

As we were checking out this morning, in the hotel lobby we ran
into a former Green who currently serves in a leadership role
within the California Federation of Labor. Back in the day,
he worked in early efforts to build Labor Party Advocates.
He has remained in communication with those labor activists
who became frustrated by the LPA's refusal to challenge
its financial base's relationship with the Democrat Party
by engaging in electoral politics, and their resistence to
challenging the comfort levels of its predominently white base
by responding to the legitimate demands of its Black supporters.

In organizing now under way which has grown from last year's
Katrina Survivors People's Assembly held in Mississippi, and as
work proceeds for the Second Survivors Assembly scheduled for
New Orleans, December 8th and 9th of this year, growing momentum
has developed for a Reconstruction Party as an electoral
vehicle, described by Kali Akuno, Executive Director of the
People's Hurricane Relief Fund and Oversight Coalition, as:
a strategic instrument that will enable the Gulf Coast
Self-Determination and Reconstruction Movement to implement
the restorative measures called for by the Tribunal through
the institution of the state.

http://www.peopleshurricane.org/ed-blog/

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Reconstruction+Party%22+Hurricane&btnG=Search

As reported that morning by that former California Green we
met in the lobby, the Reconstruction movement, and the old
Labor Party Advocates and a broad range of other independent
political forces have already issued a broadly supported letter
to Congresswoman McKinney asking that she consider carrying
their banner in an electoral effort for 2008.

I was brought into this conversation to hear his concerns that
the Green Party is not a suitable vehicle for such a run.
Even aware of the tremendous heavy lifting it has taken for
us to have our ballot lines to offer, he was of the mind that
autonomy and self-determination for a Black and Brown led
political movement was too important to risk for the short
term gains to be enjoyed by subsuming such an effort in a
predominently white Green Party.

From my past work with the Congresswoman, it is clear that
she has no interest in serving as the titular head of a Party
not ready to embrace its role of providing a vehicle for such
participation.

Ms. McKinney was clear, that the only reason she would
participate in a Green campaign was to support such a
Reconstruction agenda, including the agenda of creating
a framework which would honor the need for autonomy and
self-determination by communities of color.

Clinton ran on a Platform of naming a Cabinet which looked
like America. But images are not enough. We must do more than
colorize our Board photos. We must go further and build a Party
which at every level involves and engages, not just those Greens
of color that those of us who are white might be comfortable
working with, but those community activists who legitimately
represent the authentic leadership of communities of color.
We must be ready to operate in our discomfort zone. We must
recreate this Party so that these authentic leaders are offered

a seat at the table of decision making within the Green Party.

So I return to the question with which I opened this letter: Are
we ready as a Party to be a vehicle for such an effort? Are we
ready to open our Platform development process, leadership
bodies and slates to the leadership which would emanate from
those communities ready to coalesce around a McKinney campaign?

Because if we are not yet ready to do our internal work to
create a safe place where we can struggle together toward such
an outcome, I would rather tell my old friend not to bother
with next week's deadline for the California Presidential
Preference Primary. I would rather protect her from the abuse
and disappointment, than try to pretend that our state Parties
were ready for something we are not yet prepared to engage in,
as principled allies.

That question is left to us. And with the California Green
Party General Assembly setting their Primary ballot on the
weekend of September 8th and 9th, the window for responding
to that question is quickly closing.

Cynthia McKinney has offered a contact form on her website
where she welcomes feedback from Greens on these concerns and
regarding folks' thoughts on possibilities for 2008 in general.
Please reply at:
http://www.allthingscynthiamckinney.com/TalkBack2008

-- Hugh Esco, Delegate
Georgia Green Party

(Note from Chris: On the allthingscynthiamckinney website above,
in the audio titled "Nov 1st Statement", McKinney finally
announces that she will become a Green.)

Website http://runcynthiarun.org/
_______________________________________________________
FROM THE NATIONAL GREEN PARTY AFFAIRS LISTSERV:

According to the FEC's website, Cynthia McKinney has started
her presidential campaign committee "Power to the People".

Presented by the Federal Election Commission

MCKINNEY, CYNTHIA ID: P80004930
Office Sought: President
Election Year: 2008
State: Presidential Candidate
Party: GRE (Green Party)

PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE:
POWER TO THE PEOPLE COMMITTEE - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY FOR PRESIDENT
ID:C00440289

Year 2007
Document Filed Amended Filed On Pages
STATEMENT OF CANDIDACY 10/22/2007 2
______

Committee ID: C00440289

POWER TO THE PEOPLE COMMITTEE - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY FOR PRESIDENT
PO BOX 311759
ATLANTA, GA 31131

Treasurer Name: JOAN CHRISTIAN
Committee Designation:P (PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE OF A
CANDIDATE)
Committee Type:P (PRESIDENTIAL)
Candidate State:00 (Presidential Candidate)
CANDIDATE:MCKINNEY, CYNTHIA ID: P80004930
___________________________________________________________
MCKINNEY AT SOA PROTESTS:

http://gpuspeace.wordpress.com/


MESPLAY, KENT

WEBSITE

http://www.mesplay.org/

Mesplay speaking at the GPUS 2007 Convention"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RzsfsFJS_QKent MesplayKent Mesplay


NADER, RALPH

Ralph NaderRalph Nader

Ralph Nader has decided to run for president as an Independent, with Matt Gonzales as his running mate. Updated March 1, 2008.

Ralph Nader is not an official candidate yet, but there is a draft Nader movement in the Green Party.

Ralph's new Exploratory Committee website:

http://www.naderexplore08.org/

Hear Ralph speak at the GPUS 2007 Convention:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4586797401475004986

Go to the Draft Nader website:

http://www.draftnader.org/

Ralph Nader"s website:

http://www.nader.org

_______________________________________________
The Case for Nader

By Howie Hawkins
October 26, 2007

A strong presidential campaign by the Green Party in 2008 could fundamentally change the political dynamics of the United States. More of the public agrees with the Greens than the Democrats or Republicans on the key issues of 2008: ending the war, single-payer health care, economic security for low- and middle-income people, restoring our constitutional rights, and a serious renewable energy program to address global warming and peak oil.

In 2008, the Green Party could establish itself as a powerful opposition to the two party system of corporate rule, so credible that it becomes an indispensable part of mainstream public and media debate on the issues. Ralph Nader is the possible Green candidate who is best positioned to realize this potential. He is still considering whether to run. Here is why I think he should run.

The Time Is Right

Voters are angry and ready for an alternative. The Democrats were elected to majorities to both Houses of Congress in 2006 to end the Iraq war. Instead of exercising their majority power to use the congressional "power of the purse"
to vote down more funding for the war, the Democrats have lamely claimed they don't have the two-thirds super-majorities needed to override Bush vetoes. They have attached plans for gradual withdrawal to supplemental war funding bills that they know Bush will veto.
The Democrats had their chance. The time for the lesser evil has passed.

Voters see through the Congressional Democrats' posturing and now give them the same dismally low approval ratings they give to Bush and the Republicans. The time is right for an independent Green challenge to both corporate parties that speaks for the majority of Americans who want to get out of Iraq and back
into our communities and seriously address the crises of health care, poverty, economic security, infrastructure, energy, honest elections, and our basic constitutional rights and liberties.

Facing a weak Republican field with a base bitterly divided between social moderates and conservatives, the leading Democratic residential contenders are already running to the right, offering more war, militarism, and the whole corporate agenda wrapped in a "centrist, moderate" package on the model of the first Clinton administration. The leading Democratic presidential contenders call for "universal health care" through wasteful corporate welfare for inefficient private insurance companies when the majority of Americans support what Ralph Nader has long advocated: an efficient single-payer national health program.

The leading Democratic presidential contenders refuse to commit to bring all combat troops home from Iraq by the end of their first term in 2013, and continue to "leave all options on the table" concerning a new war on Iran. The
majority of Americans support what Ralph Nader has advocated since before the war began: get US troops out of Iraq and no war on Iran.

The leading Democratic presidential candidates address global warming and the oil supply crisis with more corporate welfare for "clean" coal, nukes, and the conversion food crops to biofuels that will raise food prices and still emit greenhouse gases. The majority of Americans support what Ralph Nader has long
advocated: an Apollo-scale program of energy efficiency, public transportation, and renewable solar- and wind-based energy sources.

The time is right for a high-impact independent Green campaign that the majority of Americans can support without reservation not a lesser evil, but a positive good.

Why Ralph Nader?

If we want a high-impact campaign that changes the political landscape in 2008, there is no candidate better positioned to make that impact than Ralph Nader.

Name Recognition: Ralph Nader has the name recognition to run a serious presidential campaign that reaches the masses of voters. Most Americans of every economic class and ethnic group know who Ralph Nader is. And what they know about Ralph Nader is that he always stands up for the little people against the big moneyed interests.

Media Presence: Nader has the public profile, record, and stature to command media attention, which he continues to receive today as a prominent public citizen. As a serious presidential candidate who could have a big impact on the debate and outcome, Nader's coverage will explode when he announces. An
historic reunion of Nader and the Greens in 2008 in a unified independent progressive presidential campaign to stop the war, meet the people's needs, and save the planet will electrify progressive activists, upset the two corporate party election dynamic, and compel the focus of the media spotlight.

Organizational Capacity: Nader has the capacity to organize and raise the funds for a serious national presidential campaign, as he has demonstrated in his previous campaigns. His many causes and projects over the years have engaged tens of thousands of active citizens across a wide variety of causes and many
of them will respond to the call for support in 2008.

Qualifications: As a serious presidential candidate, not the least reason to support Nader is that he is prepared and qualified to be president. Indeed, Ralph Nader is the most qualified and accomplished candidate for president in any party in 2008. As a prominent progressive on the national stage for over 40 years, Nader has been instrumental in the passage of more significant legislation than all the other presidential candidates combined, including the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, and the acts creating the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the National Cooperative Bank.

To help advance the progressive reform agenda, Nader pioneered the concept of citizen action groups with lobbying and litigation capacities. He has instigated scores of civic organizations dealing with consumer rights, energy, environment, union democracy, investigative reporting, corporate crime, women's rights, racial justice, poverty, fair trade, corporate welfare, cooperatives, watch dogging the legislatures and government agencies, and ending the Iraq war.

Why Green and Independent?

The Draft Nader Committee is urging Ralph Nader to seek the Green Party nomination for two very practical reasons:

Unified Campaign: The best way to build a unified independent progressive campaign in 2008 is the build out from the ballot lines and organizational base the Green Party already has in all but three states. Having a Green and
another independent progressive campaign would destroy the potential for an historic electoral insurgency.

Ballot Access: The Green Party starts with 21 ballot lines already secured for 2008, a capacity demonstrated in 2006 to get on 10 additional ballot lines, and a realistic plan and goal of securing a ballot line for the Green nominee in all 50 states and DC.

Provided Nader seeks the Green nomination, the Draft Nader Committee is open to Nader running on additional independent party lines in states where presidential fusion tickets are legal and progressive activists in those states want to do so. One benchmark for the campaign will be the 5 percent vote threshold, which triggers federal funding for the 2012 presidential campaign. Votes received by the presidential ticket on all lines count toward that 5 percent. The state parties that might want to run Nader in addition to the Greens could
include the Peace and Freedom Party of California, the United Citizens and Labor parties of South Carolina, the Progressive Party of Vermont, and the Independence and Reform lines remaining in eight states from the Perot campaigns of the 1990s.

Historic Opportunity

We believe the potential vote for a Nader candidacy is much higher than 5 percent. Public opinion polls show that voters today are more in tune with Nader's views on public policy than they were with Ross Perot's views in 1992
when he received 19 percent of the vote as a third party candidate. Indeed, in the 2000 presidential election, Nader was arguably the most preferred candidate. An analysis of the National Election Study exit poll data by
Harvard political scientist Barry Burden showed that only 9% of the people who thought Nader was the best candidate actually voted for him. If people had not voted strategically for the lesser evil, Nader would have had over 30 million votes instead of 2.9 million and might have won the election, especially if he had
been allowed into the debates.

After the compromise of voting for the lesser evil Democrat in 2000 and 2004, and for a Democratic Congress in 2006, the progressive majority of voters are ready to rebel. The self-defeating lesser evil strategy yielded no gains for peace, justice, the environment, or constitutional rights. The peace movement
and the majority of Americans who want out of Iraq are ready for candidate who crusades for their demand. People of color are tired of decades of bipartisan retreat from social justice. Millions of working people are ready for a candidate who will stand up to the corporate assault on job, pension, education, housing, and health care security.

We cannot guarantee that a full-scale voter insurgency will erupt behind a Nader candidacy. We can only recognize the potential and our responsibility to try to make it happen.
Please go to www.draftnader. org and join our efforts encourage Ralph Nader to seek the Green Party presidential nomination.

Howie Hawkins is a Green activist in Syracuse, New York and a Co-Chair of the Draft Nader Committee.

Ralph Nader's Record of Accomplishments

Instrumental in the passing of the following legislation:

National Automobile and Highway Traffic Safety Act (1965)
Clean Water Act (1968)
Clean Air Act (1970)
Co-Op Bank Bill (1978)
Law establishing Environmental Protection Agency (1970)
Consumer Product Safety Act
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Mine Health and Safety Act
Whistleblower Protection Act
Medical Devices safety
Nuclear power safety
Mobile home safety
Consumer credit disclosure law
Pension protection law
Funeral home cost disclosure law
Tire safety & grading disclosure law
Wholesome Meat Act
Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act
Wholesome Poultry Product Act
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) 1970
Safe Water Drinking Act
Freedom of Information Act
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act

Founded or sponsored the following organizations:

American Antitrust Institute
Appleseed Foundation
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest
Aviation Consumer Action Project
Buyers Up
Capitol Hill News Service
Center for Concerned Engineering
Center for Auto Safety
Center for Insurance Research
Center for Justice and Democracy
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Center for the study of Responsive Law - 1969
Center for Women Policy Studies
Citizen Action Group
Citizen Advocacy Center
Citizen Utility Boards
Citizen Works
Clean Water Action Project
Clearinghouse for Professional Responsibility
Congress Project
Congress Watch
Congressional Accountability Project
Connecticut Citizen Action Group
Consumer Project on Technology
Corporate Accountability Research Group
Critical Mass Energy Project
Democracy Rising
Disability Rights Center
Equal Justice Foundation
Essential Information
FANS (Fight to Advance the Nation's Sports)
Fisherman's Clear Water Action Group
Foundation for Taxpayers and Consumer Rights
Freedom of Information Clearinghouse
Global Trade Watch
Government Purchasing Project
Health Research Group
Litigation Group
Multinational Monitor
National Citizen's Coalition for Nursing Home Reform
National Coalition for Universities in the Public Interest
National Insurance Consumer Organization
Ohio Public Interest Action Group
Organization for Competitive Markets
Professional Drivers (PROD)
Professionals for Auto Safety

Public Citizen
Pension Rights Center
Princeton Project 55
PROD - truck safety
Public Citizen's Visitor's Center
Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGS)
Resource Consumption Alliance (conserve trees) 1004
Retired Professionals Action Group
Shafeek Nader Trust for the Community Interest
Tax Reform Research Group
Telecommunications Research and Action Center


SWIFT, KAT

WEBSITE

http://www.prezkat.info/

Swift speaking at the GPUS 2007 Convention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzHn2D789Wg
Kat SwiftKat Swift


Why the Green Party doesn't endorse Democrats

(The following letter was drafted in response to a former Green's column in the Albuquerque Tribune: "Nader may not run for White House if diplomatic Democrat presidential candidate emerges" by Abraham Gutmann) Mr. Gutmann is sorely misinformed about the Green Party and its role as an independent, noncorporate political party. He claims to have founded 'Greens for Kerry' in 2004, but this group has had no association with the Green Party itself, and endorsement of John Kerry was never an option during our 2004 nomination process. The Green Party doesn't endorse Democrats, for the same reason that Democrats don't endorse Republicans and vice versa. We're a separate party, not an appendage to the Dems. Mr. Gutman erroneously believes that Greens may be willing to support a Democrat for President whose positions might be acceptable to us, and goes on to name Barack Obama, John Edwards, and Bill Richardson. There is no support for Sen. Obama, Sen. Edwards, or Gov. Richardson in the Green Party. We plan to field our candidates for the White House in 2008, as we did in 2000 and 2004. The difference between Greens and Democrats on major issues is wider than the difference between Dems and Republicans. Greens have called for immediate withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, congressional cutoff of funding for the war to compel President Bush to bring our troops home safe and sound, and impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney for numerous high crimes and misdemeanors, including a massive deception campaign to justify the US invasion of a foreign nation. The Green Party supports single-payer national health insurance; repeal of Taft-Hartley restrictions on workplace organizing and bankruptcy bills that privilege banks and credit card companies over customers; and renegotiation of NAFTA and other trade agreements so that they uphold protections for working people in the US and other countries -- the only real solution to the flood of undocumented immigrants into the US. Greens also favor dramatic steps to conserve energy, reduce consumption of fossil fuels, and conversion to alternative energy sources in response to the global warming threat. Very few Democrats have taken these and other Green positions, certainly none of the Dems with a chance of being nominated -- even though a majority of Americans agree with the Green Party on Iraq, health care, and many other major issues. Mr. Gutman repeats the tired mythology about Green candidate Ralph Nader 'spoiling' for Al Gore in 2000. In reality, Mr. Gore was denied the White House because of Republican manipulation and obstruction of votes in Florida (especially those cast by African Americans), Mr. Gore's own failure to demand a recount in more than three counties, a patently biased Supreme Court decision (which also held that no national right to vote exists in the US), and Mr. Gore's own weak campaign, in which he even lost his home state of Tennessee. In Florida, four times as many registered Democrats voted for George W. Bush as voted for Mr. Nader. Unlike the two old parties, the Green Party and its candidates reject the corporate money and influence that have severely eroded US democracy and the rule of law under the US Constitution. We believe that the Green Party is as much a historical necessity in the 21st century as the anti-slavery Republican Party was in the mid 1800s. The only real democracy is multiparty democracy and the right to vote for a candidate who supports one's best interests and ideals. I encourage readers to learn more about the Green Party and Green candidates by visiting www.gp.org.